@dolari Geez. Reading that article, it sure looks like it.
From the original article, I think I remember their reasoning being something along the lines of "Well, if we do it for this one, maybe we have to do it for others, and government is supposed to be *neutral*." Which...yeah, that's not really how that works, I don't think; it seemed like a cop-out to me.
@dolari Geez. Reading that article, it sure looks like it.
From the original article, I think I remember their reasoning being something along the lines of "Well, if we do it for this one, maybe we have to do it for others, and government is supposed to be *neutral*." Which...yeah, that's not really how that works, I don't think; it seemed like a cop-out to me.