@xilatsdert - I thought maybe I'd typed something in wrong, or that the 2oz of spaghetti was wrong (the recipe asks for "1 serving of spaghetti"). But no, I got it all correct.
I'm guessing it's really a recipe for the sauce, and you pour as much as you want on your spaghetti, but HOLY COW.
Current Mood: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOzwyyuZnlU
@spottyfox @DeltaWye - I fy ou can get Clark's get Clark's. I haven't seen it in ages, though.
@spottyfox - Ah, yes! You know, then! It's VERY VERY VERY good. :)
@spottyfox - I always try not to poison the waters when it comes to teaberry. It's a very good very fruity wintergreen flavor.
But it's also the flavor of...a very popular medicine....
James Darren
1936-2024
Of all the loveable characters to come out of Star Trek, a 1960 Las Vegas lounge singer was not what I expected. And he was GREAT.
Ted Chiang as eloquent as ever:
"The selling point of generative A.I. is that these programs generate vastly more than you put into them, and that is precisely what prevents them from being effective tools for artists.
[...]
Many novelists have had the experience of being approached by someone convinced that they have a great idea for a novel, which they are willing to share in exchange for a fifty-fifty split of the proceeds. Such a person inadvertently reveals that they think formulating sentences is a nuisance rather than a fundamental part of storytelling in prose. Generative A.I. appeals to people who think they can express themselves in a medium without actually working in that medium. But the creators of traditional novels, paintings, and films are drawn to those art forms because they see the unique expressive potential that each medium affords. It is their eagerness to take full advantage of those potentialities that makes their work satisfying, whether as entertainment or as art.
[...]
The task that generative A.I. has been most successful at is lowering our expectations, both of the things we read and of ourselves when we write anything for others to read. It is a fundamentally dehumanizing technology because it treats us as less than what we are: creators and apprehenders of meaning. It reduces the amount of intention in the world."
Read the whole essay. It's brilliant. #ai
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-weekend-essay/why-ai-isnt-going-to-make-art
So my online banking no longer works on Firefox so I used (ugh) Edge and got instantly hit in the face with a backlog of “WE HAVE PUT AI INTO EVERYTHING; INTO YOUR TABS, INTO YOUR SEARCHES, UNDER YOUR SEAT AND IN YOUR TEETH, SEE WHAT YOU CAN DO WITH IT PLEASE THIS IS MINDBENDING TECH DON’T YOU WANT TO BE A PART OF THE FUTURE OF OUR SHAREHOLDERS” bullshit while I’m just trying to pay bills.
Artist for Closetspace and A Wish for Wings
Creative Text Writer for MTG: Universes Beyond
Writer for Sea of Legends
One enchilada short of a Mexican Platter